Showing posts sorted by relevance for query rights. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query rights. Sort by date Show all posts

Wednesday, July 04, 2012

Independence Day


IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

~ John Hancock

New Hampshire:
Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton

Massachusetts:
John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry

Rhode Island:
Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery

Connecticut:
Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott

New York:
William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris

New Jersey:
Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark

Pennsylvania:
Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross

Delaware:
Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean

Maryland:
Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton

Virginia:
George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr, Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton

North Carolina:
William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn

South Carolina:
Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr, Thomas Lynch, Jr, Arthur Middleton

Georgia:
Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton

Wednesday, January 05, 2011

The Repeal Amendment

The so-called "Repeal Amendment" is a bold proposal by states' rights advocates to thwart the growth of Federalism and to protect the prerogatives of states through an amendment to the US Constitution. What is interesting about the proposed amendment however, is that the conservative Tea Party movement seems to be leading the initiative. Keep in mind that Republicans have generally been advocates of Federalism and the transfer of power from the states to the Federal government. Indeed, Abraham Lincoln was a moderate Republican throughout his political career, and eventually lead the US through the Civil War (1861-1865) as President, the result of which was the onslaught of radical Federalism at the expense of states' rights.

The proposed text for the Repeal Amendment follows:
Any provision of law or regulation of the United States may be repealed by the several states, and such repeal shall be effective when the legislatures of two-thirds of the several states approve resolutions for this purpose that particularly describe the same provision or provisions of law or regulation to be repealed.
Follow the link below to learn more:

The Repeal Amendment

Saturday, February 05, 2011

Well Said...

"States have rights that the federal government doesn't have."

~ Mitt Romney

Hon Willard Mitt Romney (1947- )

Saturday, March 03, 2012

The US Government Is Too Big to Succeed

According to Philip K Howard of The Atlantic:
America has painted itself into a corner. Unaffordable demands for social services have led to trillion-dollar deficits, but most political leaders are unwilling to propose a real solution for fear of alienating voters who want it all. Special interests maintain a death grip on the status quo, making it hard to fix things that everyone agrees are broken.....

Change is not a remote contingency, however....

Change occurs not incrementally but in big shifts. The relative stability over the past half century is misleading. What appears to be an immutable way of governing..., is just a temporary lull between episodes of big change....

Over the past 100 years, America has made three dramatic shifts in the role of government: The Progressive era at the turn of the last century, ending laissez faire; the New Deal in the 1930s, instituting social safety nets; and the rights revolution of the 1960s. Each of these represented a radical expansion of the reach of government into society....

The challenge of the 21st century is to pull government back from daily choices while still allowing it to provide regulatory oversight and safety nets. We must discipline government's appetite for social control, and push it away from the heaping table of unaffordable mandates and bloated regulation....

Like it or not, America will change its way of governing. The growing crisis of authority will force us to start over....

The villain that keeps America stuck in a swamp is an underlying presumption about government decision-making, no less insidious because it rules from our preconceptions rather than from a palace. To get out of this mess, we must depose it, and embrace a new way of making public choices.
Read More

Philip K Howard (1948- )

Mr Howard's views are a clear warning to the status quo. What is missing from Mr Howard's editorial is the reality of US occupation forces stationed "permanently" on foreign soils since World War II, coupled with a more or less constant state of military tensions or actual armed conflicts with communism followed by terrorism during the same period. Indeed, the US will soon have to reconcile its domestic and foreign policies with its emerging budget constraints, the outcome of which is likely to include deep cuts in both butter and guns for our nation.

Source: Howard, P K (2012, March 3), The US Government Is Too Big to Succeed, The Atlantic.

Related Posts

Monday, January 02, 2012

What are Special Drawing Rights (SDR's)?

According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF):
The [Special Drawing Right, or] SDR is an international reserve asset, created by the IMF in 1969 to supplement its member countries' official reserves. Its value is based on a basket of four key international currencies, and SDRs can be exchanged for freely usable currencies.
Read More


The amorphous nature of SDR's defies modern definition and description as SDR's are an exhange instrument available for use by sovereign states rather than corporations or individuals. The IMF has published an informative paper entitled, Enhancing International Monetary Stability -- a Role for the SDR? (Moghadam, 2011), which describes how SDR's are used to enable international trade.

Watch for SDR's to play an increasingly important role in world trade settlements. Eventually, SDR's could replace sovereign currencies as the foreign exhange medium of choice globally.

Source: International Monetary Fund (IMF)

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Well Said...

"There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket."

~ Smedley D Butler

Maj Gen Smedley Darlington Butler, USMC (1881-1940)

Maj Gen Butler was twice awarded the Medal of Honor for valor in combat.

Related Posts

Sunday, November 04, 2012

Romney's Guiding Principles Tough Sell

According to Prof Robert B Reich (2012, November 3):
Romneyism has an internal coherence. It is different from conservatism, because it does not intend to conserve or protect any particular institutions or values. It is also distinct from Republicanism, in that it is not rooted in traditional small-town American values, nationalism, or states’ rights.
Prof Reich goes on to detail the ten guiding principles of "Romneyism" as:
1. Corporations are the basic units of society. Corporations are people, and the overriding purpose of an economy is to maximize corporate profits. When profits are maximized, the economy grows fastest. This growth benefits everyone in the form greater output, better products and services, and higher share prices.

2. Workers are a means to the goal of maximizing corporate profits. If workers do not contribute to that goal, they should be fired. If they cannot then find other work that helps maximize profits in another company, their wages must be too high, and they must therefore accept steadily lower wages until they find a job.

3. All factors of production – capital, physical plant and equipment, workers – are fungible and should be treated the same. Any that fail to deliver high competitive returns should be replaced or discarded. This keeps an economy efficient. Fairness is and should be irrelevant.

4. Pollution, unsafe products, unsafe working conditions, financial fraud, and other negative side effects of the pursuit of profits are the price society pays for profit-driven growth. They should not be used as excuses to constrain the pursuit of profits through regulation.

5. Individual worth depends on net worth — how much money one has made, and the value of the assets that money has been invested in. Any person with enough intelligence and ambition can make a fortune. Failure to do so is sign of moral and intellectual inferiority.

6. People who fail in the economy should not be coddled. They should not receive food stamps, Medicaid, or any other form of social subsidy. Coddling leads to a weaker society and a weaker economy.

7. Taxes are inherently bad because they constrain profit-making. It is the right and responsibility of individuals and corporations to exploit every tax loophole they (and their tax attorneys) can find in order to pay the lowest taxes possible.

8. Politics is a game whose only purpose is to win. Any means used to win the game is legitimate even if it involves lying and cheating, as long as it gains more supporters than it loses.

9. Democracy is dangerous because it is forever vulnerable to the votes of a majority intent on capturing the wealth of the successful minority, on whom the economy depends. The rich must therefore do whatever is necessary to prevent the majority from exercising its will, including spending large sums of money on lobbyists and political campaigns. The most virtuous among the rich will go a step further and run for president.

10. The three most important aspects of life are family, religion, and money. Patriotism is a matter of guarding our economy from unfair traders and undocumented immigrants, rather than joining together for the common good. We owe nothing to one another as citizens of the same society.
Mr Romney's principles, regardless of coherence, are a tough sell for many Americans...

Source: Reich, Robert B (2012, November 3), Romneyism, Robert Reich.

Related Posts

Wednesday, October 03, 2012

US Federalism on the Ropes

The epic battle between big government Democrats and military-industrial Republicans over scarce sovereign borrowing rights to fund their mutually exclusive "guns or butter" approach to Federalism is at the root of everything evil about America and her empire. What we need instead are fresh ideas that only Libertarians can deliver at this point. The continuing efforts of Democrats and Republicans to hold Main Street (and the construction sector) hostage to big government and military-industrial spending initiatives assures that Main Street will remain marginalized and mired in economic depression, as evidenced by the long-term declines in real working wages, home values, and the employment-to-population ratio. Nevertheless, the big government Democrats and military-industrial Republicans are now on the ropes, despite their best efforts to form a fascist union in American. More at:

Libertarian Party


The people are not happy; the future of America will be Libertarian.

Related Posts

Friday, January 22, 2010

Business Analytics: Questions for Enterprise

Firms today are increasingly seeking competitive advantage through advances in business analytics and decision support systems. According to a white paper published by nGenera (2008) in collaboration with Prof Thomas Davenport:
The next wave of business reengineering is being powered by business analytics, and the potential performance breakthroughs are just as large as they were 15 or so years ago. Many of these breakthroughs will come through the ability to integrate the demand side of the house with the supply side of the house as never before. Even information-rich industries have tended to concentrate on one side or the other. With the power of business analytics, corporations can make and manage the demand-supply connections – a big step closer to the goal of optimizing the performance of the corporation as a whole.

Here are six topical questions (with supporting questions) posed by nGenera for companies seeking to compete analytically:

1. Where should we leverage business analytics?

  • What is our distinctive capability? On what basis do we choose to compete? And how clear and definitive are we about that choice?
  • What performance levels or innovations in this area would blow away the competition?
  • What information, knowledge, and insight would it take to perform that way? What are the biggest unanswered questions and biggest opportunities?
  • How would we act upon that information, knowledge, and insights.

2. Why now?

  • What are our direct competitors doing or attempting with business analytics? Is anyone in our industry jumping ahead in terms of analytical capability?
  • How are analytics changing our competitive landscape? Are we at risk from non-traditional competitors who may use analytics to encroach on our markets?
  • What emerging technologies of information integration and analysis should we be exploring more aggressively?
  • How fast can we launch a serious business analytics initiative? What’s holding us back?

3. What's the payoff?

  • What are our specific performance goals in the area where we choose to compete?
  • How well do we measure them? How might better measurement and analysis of today’s performance reveal tomorrow’s opportunities?
  • How well aligned are the organization, its management, and its stakeholders with these performance goals?
  • What’s our highest ambition? What would it mean in terms of revenue, profit, and market share if we were really to change the basis of competition?

4. What information and technology do we need?

  • Is the information we need at hand? Is the data that support our distinctive capability in one repository, with common definitions of key data elements?
  • Is this data integrated enough not only to be accessible, but also to be manipulated with analytical tools?
  • How completely and accurately does the information measure and represent our distinctive business capability and basis of competition? Is it up-to-date? What are the most glaring gaps and shortfalls?
  • Do we have the technologies in place to support business analytics in this area? Or is technology fragmentation holding us back?

5. What kinds of people do we need?

  • Do we have a critical mass of analytical professionals on staff? Are we prepared to hire them? Do we need to “rent” this talent in the short term to fill gaps?
  • Who can manage analytical professionals? Who has the necessary experience, credibility, and “bridging” skills?
  • Will we be ready to train employees to apply the analytical results and operate differently?
  • Is the organization at large oriented toward analytical decision-making, or is it wedded to yesterday’s procedures and rules of thumb? How quickly can the organization come up to speed analytically?

6. What roles must senior executives play?

  • Are we committed to competing on analytics, starting at the top of the organization? What are the CEO and executive team doing to demonstrate that commitment?
  • Is the leader of the analytical function prepared to act upon the results of the analyses? Are the roles and decision rights of other stakeholders, including the CFO and CIO, clear – especially when their roles are novel or overlap?
  • Do we have a project leader who can span the worlds of strategy, process performance, and analytics?
Reference: Business Analytics: Six Questions To Ask About Information And Competition (2008), Austin, TX: nGenera Corp.